| Source |
Naipaul starts
off reading and writing by talking about his early childhood experiences with
wanting to become a great writer. He explains his lack of ability when it came
to deciphering what he was reading by himself, which was something he only
seemed able to do with the help of his father. He describes how his father was
a self-taught journalist in Trinidad.
His way of describing his father is one that paints him, while not as
traditionally one dimensional, as a character that is defined by some very
specific qualities which the reader is to find interesting.
He describes how
his father became a journalist through his own accord. His reading consisted of
only reading the parts in a story that he found interesting, skipping the other
parts in favor of starting another book. While this might have been his usual behavior,
it is difficult to think that his father never actually read an entire book, or
finished a story. What is more likely, is that Naipaul exaggerated some aspects
of his father’s life, in order to make his autobiography more interesting to
his readers. The intent here is obviously not to deceive readers about his true
experiences, but to make reading about his life a more enjoyable experience,
instead of a boring recounting of events.
Never thought about that, indeed he could be exaggerating
ReplyDeleteNow that I think about it, it is odd that his father never actually finished a book. It is probably like you said. He wanted to make his book more interesting.
ReplyDelete