Carl Jung was a renowned Swiss psychologist,
perhaps most widely known for his concept of the “collective unconscious”, and
his other contributions to related fields. Carl Jung was a man who kept
extensive diaries of his travels, such as his journey through Africa discussed in
class. Through his writing it can be
observed that Jung traveled through Tunisia with an open mind in order to
better understand both the people that lived there, that he considered very
different, and in some way himself. As
with any normal person, he wasn’t successful in completely eliminating any bias
from his thoughts, but his writing tells us of his self-awareness with regards
to his own prejudice, and gives valuable insight to the differences between his
European point of view, and how he perceives the natives.
Jung travels through the Saharan
countryside with his guide, and is intrigued with the different attitude
present towards gender and sexuality. In the village where they stop, he
notices the stark separation of genders present throughout. This is not to say
that Europeans didn’t have segregation of genders in some aspects at the time,
but we can tell that it wasn’t anywhere near the level present in the Arab
tribes. Another aspect found to differ even more was that of male homosexuality.
The Arabs openly allowed these relationships, at one point even offering Jung
himself to take part. This of course came as a shock to Jung, who had probably
never seen such behavior openly in Europe. Instead of allowing himself to be
overcome with prejudice at the thought of what at that time Europeans must have
considered a great taboo, Jung instead keeps his composure and allows the reader
an almost unbiased view of a star contrast between the Middle East and Europe
at the time. If anyone reading this is curious about the history of Homosexuality
in the Middle East, I suggest they start by reading the following link.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that Carl Jung gives valuable insight to the differences between his European point of view and how he perceives the natives and also that homosexuality is perceived with prejudice because of the european taboo at that time.
ReplyDeleteHe was indeed biased by the European superiority complex he showed but at least recognises it and try to be a part of the community he's traveling in.
ReplyDelete